The Opium Trade, Seventh through Nineteenth Centuries
he
Anglo-Chinese Opium Wars were the direct result of China's isolationalist and
exclusionary trade policy with the West. Confucian China's attempts to exclude
pernicious foreign ideas resulted in highly restricted trade. Prior to the
1830s, there was but one port open to Western merchants, Guangzhou (Canton) and
but one commodity that the Chinese would accept in trade, silver. British and
American merchants, anxious to address what they perceived as a trade
imbalance, determined to import the one product that the Chinese did not
themselves have but which an ever-increasing number of them wanted: opium. Before
1828, large quantities of the Spanish silver coin, the Carolus,
flowed into China in payment for the exotic commodities that Europeans craved;
in contrast, in the decade of the 1830s, despite an imperial decree outlawing
the export of yellow gold and white silver, "only $7,303,841 worth of
silver was imported, whereas the silver exported was estimated at $26,618, 815
in the foreign silver coin, $25,548,205 in sycee, and $3,616,996 in gold"
(Kuo, p. 51). although the Chinese imperial governed had long prohibited the
drug except for medicinal use, the "British Hong" (companies such as
Dent, Jardine, and Matheson authorized to operate in Canton) bought cheaply
produced opium in the Begal and Malwa (princely) districts under the auspices
of the British East India Company, the number 150 lb. chests of the narcotic
being imported rising from 9,708 in 1820 to 35,445 in 1835. With the British
government's 1833 cancellation of the trade monopoly enjoyed by the East India
Company, cheap opium flooded the market, and China's net outflow of silver
amounted to some 34 million Mexican silver dollars over the course of the
1830s.
As the habit of smoking
opium spread from the
idle rich to ninety per cent of all Chinese males under the age of forty in the
country's coastal regions, business activity was much reduced, the civil
service ground to a halt, and the standard of living fell. The Emperor Dao
guang's special anti-opium commissioner Lin Ze-xu (1785-1850), modestly estimated the number of
his countrymen addicted to the drug to be 4 million, but a British physician
practising in Canton set the figure at 12 million. Equally disturbing for the
imperial government was the imbalance of trade with the West: whereas prior to
1810 Western nations had been spending 350 million Mexican silver dollars on
porcelain, cotton, silks, brocades, and various grades of tea, by 1837 opium
represented 57 per cent of Chinese imports, and for fiscal 1835-36 alone China
exported 4.5 million silver dollars. The official sent in 1838 by the Emperor
Dao guang (1821-1850) of the Qing Dynasty to confiscate and destroy all imports
of opium, Lin Ze-xu, calculated that in fiscal 1839 Chinese opium smokers
consumed 100 million taels' worth of the drug while the entire spending by the
imperial government that year spent 40 million taels. He reportedly concluded,
"If we continue to allow this trade to flourish, in a few dozen years we
will find ourselves not only with no soldiers to resist the enemy, but also
with no money to equip the army" quoted by Chesneaux et al., p. 55). By
the late 1830s, foreign merchant vessels, notably those of Britain and the
United States, were landing over 30,000 chests annually. Meantime, corrupt
officials in the hoppo (customs office) and ruthless
merchants in the port cities were accumulating wealth beyond "all the tea
in China" by defying imperial interdictions that had existed in principle
since 1796. The standard rate for an official's turning a blind eye to the
importation of a single crate of opium was 80 taels. Between 1821 and 1837 the
illegal importation of opium (theoretically a capital offence) increased five
fold. A hotbed of vice, bribery, and disloyalty to the Emperor's authority, the
opium port of Canton would be the flashpoint for the inevitable clash between
the governments of China and Great Britain.
The Outbreak of the First Opium War
This war with China . . . really seems to me so wicked as to be a national sin of the greatest possible magnitude, and it distresses me very deeply. Cannot any thing be done by petition or otherwise to awaken men's minds to the dreadful guilt we are incurring? I really do not remember, in any history, of a war undertaken with such combined injustice and baseness. Ordinary wars of conquest are to me far less wicked, than to go to war in order to maintain smuggling, and that smuggling consisting in the introduction of a demoralizing drug, which the government of China wishes to keep out, and which we, for the lucre of gain, want to introduce by force; and in this quarrel are going to burn and slay in the pride of our supposed superiority. — Thomas Arnold to W. W. Hull, March 18, 1840
ritish merchants were frustrated by
Chinese trade laws and refused to cooperate with Chinese legal officials
because of their routine use of torture. Upon his arrival in Canton in March,
1839, the Emperor's special emissary, Lin Ze-xu, took swift action against the
foreign merchants and their Chinese accomplices, making some 1,600 arrests and
confiscating 11,000 pounds of opium. Despite attempts by the British superintendent
of trade, Charles Elliot, to negotiate a compromise, in June Lin ordered the
seizure another 20,00 crates of opium from foreign-controlled factories,
holding all foreign merchants under arrest until they surrendered nine million
dollars worth of opium, which he then had burned publicly. Finally, he ordered
the port of Canton closed to all foreign merchants. Elliot in turn ordered a
blockade of the Pearl River. In an ensuing naval battle, described as a victory
by Chinese propagandists, in November 1839 the Royal Navy sank a number of
Chinese vessels near Guangzhou. By January 1841, the British had captured the
Bogue forts at the Pearl's mouth and controlled the high ground above the port
of Canton. Subsequently, British forces scored victories on land at Ningbo and
Chinhai, crushing the ill-equipped and poorly trained imperial forces with
ease. Viewed as too moderate back at home, in August 1841 Elliot was replaced
by Sir Henry Pottinger to launch a major offensive against Ningbo and Tiajin. By
the end of June British forces occupied Zhenjiang and controlled the vast
rice-growing lands of southern China.
The key to British victory was Her
Majesty's Navy, which used the broadside with equal effect against
wooden-hulled vessels, fortifications are river mouths, and city walls. The
steel-hulled Nemesis, a shallow-draft armed paddle-wheeler loaned
to the campaign by the British East India Company, quickly controlled the river
basins and the Pearl River between Hong Kong and Canton, regardless of winds or
tides that limited the effectiveness of Chinese junks. On land, Chinese bows
and primitive firelocks proved no match for British muskets and artillery. For
leading the Royal Marines to victory General Anthony Blaxland Stransham was knighted
by Queen Victoria. His forces utterly defeated on land and sea,
Lin Ze-xu in September 1840 had been recalled to Peking in disgrace, and
Qi-shan, a Manchu aristocrat related to the Emperor, installed in Lin's place
to deal with the foreign devils whose decisive victories were undermining the
authority of the Qing Dynasty, which gradually lost control of a population of
300 million.
The Cost of Peace
i-shan's
first major concession was to ransom Canton in the spring of 1841 from the
British for six million silver dollars rather than try to defend it. By the
middle of 1842, the British controlled the mouth of the Yangtze and Shanghai,
and forced the Chinese to sign the first of a series of "unequal"
treaties that turned control of much of the coast over to the West. While
Chinese officials earnestly entreated Sir Henry Pottinger to cut the problem
off at its source by recommending that the British government ban the
cultivation of the poppy in India, Sir Henry argued that, as long as there
remained substantial numbers of opium-addicts and corrupt customs officers in
China, prohibiting the cultivation of opium in India "would merely throw
the market into other hands" (cited by Ssu-Yu Teng, p. 70). Under the terms
of the Treaty of Nanking (29 August 1842), signed as seems fitting now aboard a
British warship at the mouth of the Yangtze, and a further
"supplementary" treaty in 1843, China ceded the island of Hong Kong
to Great Britain, opened five "Treaty" ports (Canton, Amoy, Foochow,
Shanghai, and Ningbo) to Western trade and residence, granted Great Britain
most-favoured nation status for trade, and paid nine million dollars in
reparations to the merchants whose 20,000 chests of opium Lin Ze-xu had
destroyed. China was compelled to abolish trading monopolies and limit tariffs
to five per cent. Finally, and perhaps most important to China's loss of
nationhood, the Manchu signatories accepted the principle of "extraterritoriality," whereby Western merchants were no longer accountable to China's
laws, but rather to those of their mother countries. (In 1844, the United
States and France extracted similar concessions from the imperial government,
and the stage was set for the partition of the world's most populous nation by
the numerically inferior but technologically superior Western powers.) No
sooner had peace been negotiated than merchants began to hawk opium at
fire-sale prices, and the conclusion of the Second Opium War (1856-58) removed
all residual restraints on the trafficking of the drug as the Chinese
themselves began poppy cultivation: by 1880, China was still importing 6,500
tons annually, but by 1900 it was producing some 22,000 tons itself.
The Second Opium War
he outbreak
of fresh hostilities under such circumstances was almost inevitable because
Chinese officials were extremely reluctant to enact the terms of the treaties
of 1842-44. Since the French and Americans had extracted additional concessions
since the signing of the Treaty of Nanking, including clauses about
renegotiation after twelve years, Great Britain insisted upon exercising its
"most-favoured nation status" in 1854. This time, the British
demanded that China open all her ports to foreign trade, legalise the
importation of opium from British possessions in India and Burma, exempt
British goods from all import duties, and permit the establishment of a full
embassy in Peking. For two years Qing court officials stalled, trying to buy
time. However, events ran out of their control when on 8 October 1856 officials
boarded the Chinese-registered but Hong Kong-based merchant vessel Arrow, which they suspected of involvement in both smuggling
and piracy. The British trade officials naturally argued that as a foreign
vessel the Arrow's activities did not fall under
Chinese legal jurisdiction, and that therefore the sailors who had been
arrested should be released under the extraterritoriality clause of the Treaty
of Nanking.
Having dealt with the temporary
distraction of the Sepoy Mutiny in India, in 1857 Great Britain dispatched forces to Canton in a
coordinated operation with American warships. France, seething over the recent
Chinese execution of a missionary, Father August Chapdelaine, joined Russia,
the U. S. A., and Great Britain against China. However, a joint Anglo-French
force, without other military assistance, under the command of Admiral Sir
Michael Seymour, Lord Elgin, and Marshall Gros seized Canton late in 1857 after
valiant but futile resistance by the city's citizens and Chinese soldiers. In
May 1858, the Anglo-French naval taskforce captured the Taku forts near Tiensin
(Tianjin), effectively ending hostilities. France, Russia, the United States,
and Great Britain then forced China to agree to open eleven more major ports to
Western trade under the terms of the Treaty of Tientsin (June 1858). When the
Chinese once again proved slow to enact the terms of the treaty, Britain order
Admiral Sir James Hope to shell the Chinese forts at the mouth of the Peiho
River in 1859. The Chinese capitulated, permitting all foreigners with
passports to travel freely in China, and granting Chinese who converted to
Christianity full property rights.
Since Chinese officials once again
refused to enact a treaty provision, namely the establishment of Western
embassies in Peking, an Anglo-French force launched a fresh offensive from Hong
Kong in 1860, ultimately destroying the Emperor Xianfeng's Summer Palace in
Chengde, and the Summer Palace and the Old Summer Palace in Peking amidst
wide-spread looting by both troops and civilians.
Under the terms of the Convention of
Peking, signed by Prince Gong, brother of the Emperor Xianfeng, on 18 October
1860, the ports of Hankou, Niuzhuang, Danshui, and Nanjing were opened to
foreign vessels, as were the waters of the Yangtze, and foreign missionaries
were free to proselytize. China had to pay further reparations, this time ten
million taels, to each of France and Britain, and another two million taels to
British merchants for destruction of property. Finally, China ceded the port of
Kowloon to Great Britain, and agreed to permit the export of indentured Chinese
labourers to the Americas. Arguably, without such a massive injection of cheap
labour the transcontinental railways of the United States and Canada would not
have been completed so quickly and economically. On the other hand, China's
humiliation led directly to the fall of the Manchu Dynasty and the social
upheavals that precipitated the Boxer Rebellion of 1900.
What had begun as a conflict of
interests between English desire for profits from the trade in silk, porcelain,
and tea and the Confucian ideal of self-sufficiency and exclusion of corrupting
influences resulted in the partitioning of China by the Western powers
(including the ceding of Hong Kong to Great Britain), humiliating defeats on
land and sea by technologically and logistically superior Western forces, and
the traditional values of an entire culture undermined by Christian
missionaries and rampant trading in Turkish and Indian opium. No wonder the
Boxer rebels' chief goal was to purify and reinvigorate their nation by the
utter annihilation of all "foreign devils."
References
Chesneaux, Jean, Marianne Bastid, and Marie-Claire Bergere. China from the Opium Wars to the 1911 Revolution. Trans. Anne Destenay. New York: Pantheon, 1976.
"Emergence of Modern China." U. of Maryland site. 18/06/2006.
Fay, Peter Ward. The Opium War 1840-1842. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1975.
Hayes, James. "That Singular and Hitherto Almost Unknown Country": Opinions on China, The Chinese, and the "Opium War" Among British Naval and Military Officers Who Served During Hostilities There. Hong Kong-based site. 18/06/2006.
Kuo, P. C. A Critical Study of the First Anglo-Chinese War with Documents. Westport, Conn.: Hyperion, 1935.
Morley, Henry. "Our Phantom Ship: China." Household Words No. 66 (28 June 1851): 325-331.
Teng, Ssu-Yu.Chang Hsi and the Treaty of Nanking 1842. Chicago: U. Chicago Press, 1944.
Waley, Arthur. The Opium War Through Chinese Eyes. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958.
Wallbank, Taylor, et al. "A Short History of the Opium Wars." Civilizations Past and Present, 1992. Schaffer Library of Drug Policy. 18/06/2006.